Not enough info to be specific, but I would look first at the schematic. Have you performed a rules check?
Have you looked at the schematic where a message was generated for and seen anything “out of place”?
You will also have to look at the library “Shield Arduino Nano”. Does it actually exist? When you placed it on the schematic does is “look” like you expect?
I am using a different version of Kicad but I’ve not seen a library with that name. Is it possible the library is not correctly installed?
BTW generally the “air wires” are called “rats nest” in the forum. Doesn’t matter much but a reply might use a different name.
BTW you don’t need to go through export then import of netlist between eeschema and pcbnew. Use Update PCB from the dropdown or F8. Even for the initial import. This in fact is the correct and faster way.
I would not expect the rats nest to be complete until you have footprints assigned to every symbol. The update will give you the errors you need to fix.
As others already wrote, the version number you posted is incomprehensible, and for several years already it’s not needed to first generate a netlist and than load it into Pcbnew. The recommended way is Eeschema / Tools / Update PCB from Schematic [F8].
I am guessing that you have a mismatch in pin numbers between the schematic symbol and the footprint. The arduino nano is in “DIP” format, and the Footprint (for on the PCB) may have pin numbers ranging from 1 to 40 (if that is the max of that thing) while the schematic apparently uses the arduino names such as “A9”.
Pin numbers in the schematic have to match with the pin numbers in the PCB Footprint.
If you update the PCB from the schematic with [F8] then you get the dialog from the screenshot below. If you save the text it generates into a test (report) file, and post that text here, then it’s much easier to diagnose what is actually going wrong.
When I run the electricity rules checker it gives me a bunch of errors because apparently I haven’t assigned the correct pin types yet.
The Arduino nano footprint looks good. I also noticed that some of the components with missing air wires don’t give me an error message, do you know why? Also I do see some air wires connected to the arduino nano, about half of the ones that should be connected.
Notice that there are 8 errors in my example, from “pad 1” through “pad 8” (The’re not printed in order).
All the errors are for “J1”. This is an 8-pin connector in the schematic:
The first error complains about “pad 6” not found.
This is because KiCad tries to match the pin number “6” with pad number “6” in the footprint, but the footprint does not have a pad number “6” because I assigned a BGA package to the connector.
In the Library Browser, you can see the pad numbers of this package. All pads “numbers” have two characters. A letter (“a”, “b”, or “c” and a digit “1”, “2” or “3”)
So there is no match for the single digit pin numbers in the schematic with the two character pad numbers of the Footprint, and therefore KiCad prints them as errors and you have to fix this first.
In KiCad any schematic symbol can be linked with any PCB Footprint, and when they do not match, then you get errors like these. “Pin numbers” are not just numbers in KiCad, they can be any alphanumeric string (at least upto 4 characters in length).
To fix this, you have to either change the schematic symbol (In the schematic symbol editor), or the PCB Footprint (In the Footprint editor) to make the pin numbers match with the pad numbers. To do this properly, you also have to learn a bit of library management.
The FAQ part of this forum has a lot of good articles about different parts of KiCad.
I found this out myself and did what you suggested, this fixed about half of the missing air wires but there are still a good amount of them missing.
Thanks for the beginners tutorial by the way.
It also looks like there is a problem with the schematic symbol for U6.
If I look for example at a resistor in the Symbol Editor, then the Pin Name is a tilde, but the pin number is just a regular number. The tilde has a sort of meaning that the pin name does not have a sensible meaning (for a resistor).
I do not know what these others are:
and can not help without more info from your side, but the way to solve it is probably similar to the already solved issues.
I noticed that a lot of the components in my layout have no air wires connected to them and give no error message. Other forum archives mentioned that it might be a rendering issue. I experimented with changing the orientation and location of some of the parts and discovered that, specifically when I rotate an object, it shows that all the pins are connected to the location that the object used to be in. But, after I place the object in a new location, the extra air wires disappear. This also happens for pins that are not connected in the schematic. Has anyone else encountered stuff like this and do you know what it means? And does anyone have strategies that might help with the missing air wires?
I’ll just mention a useful feature of KiCad which you may find useful for debugging this and in future, the Highlight Net tool, second from the top on the RHS vertical icon menu in both eeschema and pcbnew. This will show all connected wires or traces respectively when clicked on a wire or copper area. If both windows are open then highlighting a net in the schematic will do the same on the board, and vice versa.
If the pads that are should be connected are indeed highlighted but there is no rats nest line, that would suggest a rendering issue.
The usual name for those “airwires” is “ratsnest”.
It’s not just a rendering issue. Pad 2 of the resistor is connected to the net “3.3V”, while pad 1 of the resistor has no net name on it.
A common mistake that beginners make is to fiddle with the grid in Eeschema. Eeschema depends on perfect alignment between the pins and the start points for wires, and this depends on a coarse grid such as the “50” that is the default. If your pins and wires show little circles and squares as in Newbie Snap to Grid Zoom then they are not connected.
What is the output of Eeschema / Inspect / Electrical Rules Checker?
Also, the easiest way to diagnose problems is if you zip the whole project and upload it here.
Hi,
I zipped y project in the kicad home page and tried uploading it here but I always get a message saying “Sorry, new users cannot upload attachments”
But however I can still upload screenshots. Any ideas?
]
And where does the idea come from to give a pin a pin number A4, and a pin name A0 at the same time ???
To me it looks like you’d better start over from scratch with a beginner tutorial, and then make sure you understand each step before you execute it.
Unfortunately the official “Getting started Guide for KiCad” documentation is a bit … neglected.
The FAQ part of this forum though has some nice tutorials.
Here is a beginners tutorial:
Thanks a lot for the helpful advice!
I was wondering if airwires are that necessary to designing a PCB. Other sources state that they only provide the shortest possible connection not actual connections. I do see about 60 to 70 percent of the air wires and was wondering if that is enough to skip getting the last of the air wires?
Thanks for your help!
For years I have understood ratsnest as the set of all the airwires.
When we had to invent a word in Spanish for airwire we chose the same word as airline thinking no one would get misled.
