Where to find DB36 symbol

Hey folks, brand new to KiCad. I am working on a DB9 to DB36 serial to parallel circuit but cannot find a DB36 type connector symbol anywhere. I see a DB37?
Cheers
Dukester

What you’re looking for is probably a Centronics 36-pole connector. No idea if it’s in the (miserable) KiCAD library.

Yes, that’s the one I need. Thought it would be in the D-sub library but alas not.

See this document, an unusual pitch 2.16 mm

1 Like

Miserable? I have found it fairly well provided for and of high quality. Probably more importantly, it is easy to make new symbols and footprints.
The librarians are a very small team and have prioritised quality over quantity. Would you rather have more symbols/footprints but find they frequently have errors?
You do know that you can import Eagle components and also SnapEDA provide a KiCad format download?
If you have produced your own symbols and footprints and providing they are KLC compliant, you can submit a pull request to merge them into the libraries for others to benefit from and grow the library. Perhaps if more people did this you wouldn’t consider the !library so miserable?

2 Likes

Do you need a symbol or a footprint? If a symbol, then how about conn_02x18_Top_Bottom. As for the footprint, it probably depends on the model you have or plan to buy.

1 Like

Yes, miserable.
Contrary to your assertion, the symbol libraries in KiCAD are bloated with lots of exotic/unnecessary stuff, whereas central libraries like 7400 are full of mistakes and omissions.

Yes, I make my own libraries, and it’s not that hard, but it shouldn’t really be necessary for standard stuff.

To my mind, the whole GitHub/GitLab thing with it’s pull/push/shove/stick it up your… is a total mistake, which will encourage no one but software geeks (who know very little about electronics engineering) to participate.

The right approach IMO would be a submission site/page to upload new libraries, that then will be vetted/approved by an Editor-in-Chief or an editorial team.
I know that the “Boss” approach is unpopular in FOSS, but sometimes it’s necessary. Just look at the success of (x)Ubuntu as compared to other distributions.

BTW: try to find a correct symbol for 74HC73 (not exactly an exotic part). It ain’t there.

That’s a cool find, thanks!

Just a symbol for now. I pretty much had my own drawn out in the symbol editor when I saw your idea. That will work just fine for what I am doing. Thanks!

In addition: one can open altium (not just eagle) design with that symbol or footprint and save that thing into ones own kicad library.

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.