Semantic problem with KiCad component treatment?

Unfortunately that is not all.
I see quite some veiled statements that could easily be interpreted as insults (he is better than the “mob” he dismisses and does not want to engage with it.)

I think I got “banned” by him for repeatedly asking for some clarification and asking for a response to my idea of the “Virtual Fields” which I later put in a different topic to keep it away from all this noise. Maybe he did give some answer that got lost in all the noise, but I’m not going to read those 170 posts again. I know I have some faults, and one of them is not being able to recognize a good idea when it’s covered by too much noise. When I was working out some details about those “Virtual Fields” I discovered it’s already implemented in KiCad. KiCad V6 is also still quite new to me.

He also writes whole paragraphs over how good he is and how much work he has done and how much experience he has. He clearly has a high opinion of himself, but that does not mean much to me. According to his statistics he has viewed 74 topics and read 743 posts in the 20 day’s he’s a member. He does put a lot of effort in it, and not only in this post, so that at least is something positive.

1 Like