Pin not driven - yet connected

Hi,

this is driving me crazy

I am a complete noob to kicad, so I try to make a schematic, then subdivide it for clarity, using pin labels (ports?)

now when I run a check all my pins are triggering errors in the rule checker

what do I do wrong ?

thanks for your help

https://forum.kicad.info/search?q=pin%20connected%20to%20other%20pins%20but%20not%20driven%20by%20any%20pin%20category%3A19

it’s connected to a power pin (vcc and +5V) it should not trigger an alarm
hence my post

You have to add the: “PWR_FLAG” symbol to the Vcc net (and probably also to the GND net. Search this forum for “PWR_FLAG” to learn what it is and how it works.

why is it not automatic, if I choose VCC or +5V, it’s obviously not a piece of chicken

If it was automatic, it would defeat the purpose, which is to help the designer think about what they are doing.

Seems to have worked perfectly :slight_smile:

Btw, you probably only need the +5V power label. But none of them provide power.

1 Like

Please do some reading before commenting.
There are very good reasons and this subject has been spelled out tens of times on this forum.

1 Like

yep indeed, makes sens…so as far as I understand it is needed for standalone boards not connected to regulators and such

sorry for the dumb question, it will take a while to change my habbits from eagle

You also only need one GND label.

1 Like

is it not what I’ve done ?

You don’t need a GND global label as well as the GND symbol. Use one or the other. GND symbols are connected automatically anyway.

1 Like

thx, I was wondering which one to use, labels or components

For GND or power, I prefer the power symbols. Some people use global labels for power.

You have also added local labels which is superfluous, and will be overridden anyway.

1 Like

local labels ? you mean +5V ? I’ll remove them

Edit: i just added a screenshot to my tutorial to show how each label type looks like and what button adds each of them.

1 Like

Also regarding the need for PWR_FLAG (@Curtis_Newton seems to have sorted, but I’m adding this to others who find this thread searching for help), there is this useful FAQ entry:

Personally, because PWR_FLAG is necessary in some cases I like to make it necessary on my schematics for all cases for consistency reasons. Especially since I use the PWR_FLAG symbol as documentation for the source of power. Thus, even on power regulators I use power input type pins on the outputs. If you want to also follow suit, please recognize that my technique will then no longer trap the error of connecting the output of two different regulators together.

You can also edit the connector and save it locally for your project, as a power connector with the pins properly categorized. Then you won’t need the PWR_FLAG hack (which only adds a token output pin to a net otherwise consisting of all inputs and passives).