Need help with a L-shaped pad with v8

I hereby certify that I am not simply asking someone else to design a footprint for me.

Hi,

I am currently trying to design a footprint for the LMR60410 step down converter from TI.
The recommended land pattern has a lot of L-shaped pads with rounded corners. The definition can be found here https://www.ti.com/lit/ml/mpqf742d/mpqf742d.pdf

My approach was to draw the shape with lines, use the “Shape Modification” tool to add rounded corners and than convert the shape to a polygon.

But I ran into the problem that the corners of the polygon are not round.
This image shows the line shape with different line widths for test.
image

After converting it to a polygon it looks like this:
image

Is the pad to small or is there a better way to do this kind of shape?

Kicad Version: 8.0.9, release build

Did you use “Fillet Lines” in the shape modification?

yes.

I have drawn the shaped with 90° corners and than used “Fillet Lines”

What is your grid so I can attempt a similar shape?

Can you use this file:
test.kicad_mod (3.8 KB)

My grid is set to minimum (0.01mm)

Work on my 8.0.9 on Windows. Line width - default 0.2mm.
I tried grid 0.1mm and 0.01mm.

I drew the shape, filleted corners, then created a polygon from selection.

This is the result:
image

What size has your shape?

The bigger the shape the lesser a problem it seems.

Zooming in shows that the corners are also “stepped”

I tried a smaller pad and it is visible indeed.
This is roughly 0.6 x 0.7mm, fillet 0.1 mm. Line thickness 0.05 mm.
The image below shows roughly 0.15 x 0.12 mm area. The steps are roughly of 0.03 mm, so not bad considering this has to be manufactured and probably will be rounded anyway (or squared) in the PCB manufacturing process.
Corners “stepped” issue is very common in CAD software when you zoom it in enough. Depends on the software - sometimes it is only visual, sometimes this is actually how the part will look in the real life
Not sure how it is in KiCad though.
image

I personally would not assign that odd footprint. I would just use the standard footprint for that package and then, in layout, use filled zones to satisfy their suggestion (more or less).
If you want to use a finished layout with all the caps and inductors, a block (or how is it called?) would be a better option.