I used a combination of a vector and group bus which works because the ratsnets is just fine.
But the ERC is telling my otherwise. Since I have valid connections I am going to ignore it.
But I am curious to what is going on? Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong with the naming?
Kind regards,
Bas
That is a bit of a premature conclusion ERC is throwing an error so there probably is something wrong. I do not use buses much and tend to forget the details. How can sw[1..8] be a wire? A group of wires is a bus, so it should be a fat blue line instead of a thin green one. My best guess is that its not recognized as a bus, and the labels near the nets are interpreted as just local labels that make connections outside of the bus.
While searching this forum for the old experiment I did with bus naming, I bumped into a topic from you in 2023.
*Edit: Added back quotes around sw[1..8] because else the forum software puts 3 dots in the center, while KiCad really uses two.
How can sw[1…8] be a wire?
That makes sense 
The thing, it is a hierarchial bus. I dont use global labels, yet KiCad understood which connections I want to make.
The other end of this bus in an other sheet. There I find the other ‘side’ of the error.
I have a bright idea I go look in the manual.
Kind regards,
Bas
