I would not ignore them.
The router engine thinks they are not connected. I would try to understand why this is.
Have you checked for parity between your layout and the schematic?
ETA:
Oh. You have connected two nets: SDA and SDA0, and SCL and SCL0.
How did you manage to do that?
An ERC would probably have warned you about dangling wires too. The fact that the pad was SCL and the track SCL0 was also a giveaway. One net name will win and the pad would have acquired the same net name as the track.
For some reason I didn’t see this on ERC. But I didn’t check ignore list either.
I am a bit carefull with ERC and such. It wants to fix things which are not broken. Like footprint outlines, some corners on tracks and so on.
Some day when I have time I’ll fix those, but not tonight.
Just for future reference, SDA0 is not the same as SDA, they are different nets and, according to your schematic, should not be connected. I know you now know the cause but this kind of thing should jump out at you during layout, it’s also possible to set the interactive router to not allow you to make such connections.