Also if a reference ends in a lower case i would read this as: This is part of a multi unit symbol. (So i would expect C1b and C1a to be in the same physical package. Example a capacitor array)
It sounds like I need to re-think my numbering. (I wasn’t aware of the multi-unit part convention.)
I’m implementing a “known” schematic with a few ancillary parts added. I don’t want to renumber things as that will make references to the original circuit more difficult. But on further thought appending them to the end of the number set (C12) rather than trying to insert into the middle (C7b) might be better…
Well, I just added a dual triode tube to one of my schematics, and now I know what you all mean by multi-unit parts.
Very cool feature, although a little clunky to edit (primarily since I only have the option of “shared with all” and “not shared”, when dual triodes of course have stuff shared between the two triode sections, but not the heater section).