Default Page Layout - How to set it? (Eeschema/Linux)

The schematic editor (KiCad project and Eeschema standalone) always defaults to a certain page layout. This layout is not editable in any way (it seems to be hardcoded), which means editing the /usr/share/kicad/template/pagelayout_default.kicad_wks file brings zero success.

Using the “Page layout description file” field in EEschema is also useless, as it only works on the current open schematic, and will be ignored on opening the .sch file anew.
There is no way to set a default page layout.
In the KiCAD “Page layout editor”: same thing. It will work in the current project, but any new start of KiCad will bring up the hardcoded default page.

I have two questions:

1: is there an “officially tested and approved” way of setting the default page layout? Until now I’ve found none in any search or documentation.

2: I’ve found my own way of solving this problem, but no documentation or searches have told me that it’s OK. Can someone from the KiCAD team confirm my solution?

This is my solution:

Append the following lines to /usr/share/kicad/template/kicad.pro

[schematic_editor]
version=1
PageLayoutDescrFile=/usr/share/kicad/template/pagelayout_default.kicad_wks

This will make KiCAD and Eeschema read the stored layout file instead of the hardcoded one. Works perfectly, but as it is undocumented (and thus unsupported), I’ve no idea what will happen after the next upgrade :frowning:

Dear KiCAD Team, please state your opinion…

This forum is run by end users, not by the “KiCad Team” (although we may be thought as part of the team, and some developers may read this, too).

If I understood you correctly, you already know this:

KiCad has project templates. You can create a project, set the project settings and save it to the template folder.

image

Then you can start a new project by using New -> Project from Template.

I haven’t used templates myself so YMMV.

1 Like

eelik is correct.

I have several temaplates - each with a different Icon and preview - they appear in the new project from Template panel).

Example:

Thank You both.
But you’re missing the point: I’m not talking about templates. I have those and they’re completely useless to me (Arduino, Beaglebone, whatever) and I ignore them. They’re defined in directories with a “meta” subdirectory with a .html file and, and, and.

I’m one level lower: a simple schematic layout sheet, in which I want the lower right corner to be to my liking as default.
That’s in KiCAD not “template”, but “page layout”. And it doesn’t work as it should.

My apologies for imagining that this is a kind of “official” KiCAD site.

I could always reflect that back on you. What @BlackCoffee seems to be describing is a template that is just your preferred defaults (including a custom worksheet file). So when starting a new project instead of selecting “New/Project…” and then modifying the OEM defaults, you select “New/Project from Template…” and select the template that you’ve already set up with YOUR defaults.

@SembazuruCDE Bingo! Exactly:

Using the Layout tool, I hacked up the default to suit me and saved it as mySchematic Template. I created a new PCB with my pref’s/etc and saved it as my Base…etc template. Added the Icon/Meta stuff and placed them into myTemplates folder…

A clarification: Though I saved the first as mySchematic… It’s just a template Worksheet used by Both the Schematic and the PCB’s sheet. Probably should rename them…


Screen Shot 2020-08-10 at 8.05.29 PM

@BlackCoffee, your suggestions are indeed helpful, but to me total overkill.

I’m basically only interested in using Eeschema standalone, thus my question.

Building a complete KiCAD template from scratch (which seems to the be only official way to go?) without any examples (why is an “example template” not available, just a load of “Arduino”, “STM32” this and that?) is a project in itself, which I do not need right now.

It’s certainly a steep learning curve getting into KiCad.

But OK, I have a working (though undocumented and not officially supported) solution to my immediate issue.
Let’s leave it at that. Thank You for your replies.

It’s simple and I’ll leave it at this:

Whether in Stand-Alone or in the full App mode, your custom Worksheet is loaded the same way.

THIS WORKS: Once getting a worksheet with your Defaults, Save it with a unique name, such as: My_StandAlone_WS.

Now when wanting to use it with Eeschema stand-alone, Open Eeschema stand-alone, Click the Page Settings Icon at top left and load you new worksheet. Done (no need to edit or redo anything).

1 Like

I think the idea was to not be forced to do this for each schematic, but only once in some general settings for all future schematics.


In the next upgrade that kicad.pro file will be overwritten and you have to edit it again.

There just might be a place in your personal config where this kicad.pro is looked for, but I don’t know.

In any case this works only as long as you are the only user of those schematic files and use them on the same machine. Because the worksheet file is external to the schematic, it should be the same for all installations. That’s why a project and a template is good: you save the worksheet into the template project, start a new project from the template, and the worksheet goes with the schematic. (As was already said, templates are not only for half-made boards, they are good also for small settings tweaks and empty projects.)

Whether this is a good or a bad thing, I can’t say. Maybe it would be better if the worksheet could be embedded into the schematic. You could file an issue to the gitlab issue database if you want to.

You can set the env var KICAD_TEMPLATE_DIR to change the directory that is searched.

Or rather KICAD_USER_TEMPLATE_DIR?

I filed this issue to the gitlab wishlist time ago:

1 Like

a general template default would be useful but there are two things that are really annoying at the moment

  1. hierarchical sheets can have different sizes. typically I do check this but every now and again its only at PDF generation that I spot one sheet is say A4 while the rest are A3 …

  2. ordering of the parameters
    Every single time this gets me

1 Like

He seems to grasp the question. I open Eeschema (standalone) and yes it would be nice if it opened to my custom page layout but for me it is only a quick 6 mouse clicks to have my layout on screen. Never started a project or designed a board. Would be nice but not critical when the developers have many higher priority issues to work on. Wonderful program.

The lack of default page size/layout is a long running annoyance. This is a common expectation of noobs. It is not unreasonable.

Yes there are templates but changing a blank sheet and saving ought to set the defaults.

I’m returning here as the OP (although I left the thread earlier), as this subject seems to have raised some interest.

To me, there a basic flaw in the Page Layout handling in Eeschema (and also in KiCAD generally).

To me, the logic should be:
1: does a user-defined default page layout exist and is it known to Eeschema/KiCAD?
2: if yes, use it as default for the new schematic/project and modify as needed.
3: if no, use the hard coded page layout and modify as needed.
4: store the page layout with the design files.

But the current implementation directly slams you with the hard coded layout right from the start, and you’re forced to manually redefine the “Page layout description file” field in “Page Settings” every time, just to see that opening the design file later on will revert to the hard coded page layout. Wasted time, work and effort.

My (unsupported, undocumented) implementation using “PageLayoutDescrFile=” in the kicad.pro file improves the situation a lot, but I’m still presented with the hard coded page layout file when starting, and have to select “New” every time to get my layout loaded.

I couldn’t find a feature request on GitLab for default page layout or page size. Annoyances are likely to remain if there aren’t issues filed to put them on the developers’ radar!

I did. Not a feature request, but a thread about how to handle this issue. Apparently, it’s about backward compatibility with older design files. Very low priority, but high user annoyance.

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.