Does selecting a net in schema will show the corresponding net in PCB and vice versa
I know component works but does net-name also work, I try but it didn’t any result.
Thanks you,
Tom
Does selecting a net in schema will show the corresponding net in PCB and vice versa
I know component works but does net-name also work, I try but it didn’t any result.
Thanks you,
Tom
It will in v5! (it’s a new feature, in nightlies now). You need to have highlight tool turned on in both eeschema and pcbnew, and then you can cross-probe by clicking on any net object on either side (schematic or PCB)
I was hoping somebody closer to the development effort would respond to this . . . .
I believe this feature will be implemented in the V5.0 release. At least partially implemented.
I am running a Nightly build from almost a year ago. If I click on a symbol in EESchema, then PCBNew will pan to center the corresponding footprint in the display window and highlight it. It’s just a pan, not a zoom, so if you are already zoomed out, you might have to look hard to see the highlighted footprint. The other direction also works, though not as emphatically - select a footprint by clicking on it in PCBNew, and the cursor in EESchema will center on the associated symbol.
Clicking on a trace, or a connecting wire, doesn’t have any effect in my Nightly version.
Dale
In recent nightlies it should be working, but you have to be in “highlight net” mode on both sides – if you don’t choose the highlight mode first, it won’t do anything. If you click a net in eeschema, it should pan and zoom in pcbnew. If you click a net in pcbnew, it will NOT pan and zoom in eeschema, because we couldn’t decide on the best behavior for that (what if a net is across multiple sheets?). Wayne agreed we could revisit whether or not there is any reasonable pan/zoom behavior for the schematic in V6.
Please let me know if you can’t get it working with modern nightlies (this feature went in around 2018-01-08)
I wasn’t part of that discussion, nor do I knowingly have access to the logs of the discussion, but should this idea be revisited I have two thoughts:
I think I’d prefer the latter method, so (for example) when trying to figure out where on the schematic the pin of the connected net on a part with multiple gates on the schematic is. (Or different schematic parts of a microcontroller.)
But for now, lets let the devs concentrate on getting V5 out.
This topic was automatically closed 30 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.