I did it doing the out-line and then filling it with a pad and the parts that were empty with normal lanes.
After filling all the box, I click on create a pad with selected shapes ( I have the software in Spanish but I suppose that the option is called like that or similar).
That’s the result I get after doing the pad with shapes:
If you draw an arc with KiCad and zoom very close you see that it’s not actually an arc but a bunch of straight segments. And that’s perfectly OK because the physical resolution of the pcb etching process isn’t 100% accurate. You can drag a polygon which looks good enough.
Does it ever require a lot of time to learn a new CAD program? If @maui tells which basic workbench (set of drawing tools) is used to draw that pad you can go for a tutorial in FreeCAD web pages and learn enough of it in one day, I guess.
I tried one time to learn freeCAD like half year ago or more, but it was kinda different of AutoCAD. Would be really good to still have AutoCAD but that’s not possible anymore. Let’s see what @maui says… :)!
In KiCAD you need to apply this workaround… approximate an arc to a polyline to have a filled shape (as @Rene_Poschl said ‘Every other primitive is not’ closed)
Mainly you need some basis on the Sketcher Workbench (which is already included in FreeCAD) and StepUp Workbench (this can be installed through the menu ‘Tools’ ‘Addon manager’ of FreeCAD).
I already posted above a sample FreeCAD file (fp-test.FCStd) to handle this pad shape… so @marc1996 would need only to modify the included sketch and export the footprint to kicad using StepUp WB.
Have a look at kicadStepUp-cheat-sheet
First of all, after having the shape but not filled, I placed a rectangular pad in the rectangular space of the shape. Secondly, I went to the same point where my arc was drawn and I started to fill the 2nd space with arcs, each time with less radius till filling it.
Once all the shape was filled, I did a new pad using the rectangular and the arcs that were used to fill.
I thought that maybe this is being influenced by the dimensions of the pad because it is like 1,6mm * 0,3 approx.
EDIT: Thinking about it, what about not doing the Pad with all the elements? I can just have the rectangular pad and the other space filling the shape. The only problem I can see is in the PCB layout when doing the connections you wont have that much freedom in how to connect the trace to the pad. ( hope I’m not wrong…)