Arduino nano footprint bad

I am trying to create a schematic using an arduin nano,the one that comes in the library seems bad with a few pinss mssing and 5v and ground in the wrong places,any ideas?,i am looking at the nano v3 and i am using kicadApplication: KiCad Schematic Editor x64 on x64

Version: 8.0.6, release build

Libraries:
wxWidgets 3.2.6
FreeType 2.13.2
HarfBuzz 9.0.0
FontConfig 2.14.2
libcurl/8.8.0-DEV Schannel zlib/1.3.1

Platform: Windows 11 (build 22621), 64-bit edition, 64 bit, Little endian, wxMSW
OpenGL: NVIDIA Corporation, Quadro FX 2700M/PCIe/SSE2, 3.3.0

Build Info:
Date: Oct 14 2024 01:02:33
wxWidgets: 3.2.6 (wchar_t,wx containers)
Boost: 1.85.0
OCC: 7.8.1
Curl: 8.8.0-DEV
ngspice: 43
Compiler: Visual C++ 1939 without C++ ABI

Build settings:

I haven’t bothered looking at the symbol, but if the pin numbers are right, it doesn’t matter if the location of the pins doesn’t match the device footprint.
Lots of schematic symbols are re-drawn for clarity (like, all the ground pins are next to each other on one edge). What matters is the pin numbers matching the correct footprint.

thats the whole point tho as all the pins are jumbled up on the footprint as oposed to reality!,how could of kicad be like this?,its pretty pisspoor to have the footprint so wrong on a common part!.

If you don’t like it, draw your own symbol. Nobody is stopping you.

for example on the included footprint for a nano v3 it has gnd+vcc on the bottom end of the board when on the actual pcb they are the first 2 pins on one side not on the bottom edge!,as i said its shit!.

This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.

The 5V and GND look right.

5V on pin 27,GND on 4 which matches the footprint.

this is what mine is like,see pic


its way wrong.

what nano is that called in the symbols library then,my bum one is nano ver3 i think.,but all the nano’s in my library look bad like the pic i posted!.

That’s the same one I’m using. Why do you think it’s bad? The pin numbering matches the footprint. (Arduino_Nano)

gmc,where did you find that footprint?.

image

look at v in and gnd for starters gmc.

I’m not following. It’s correct.

Vin - Pin 30
GND pins 4 and 29
Symbol and footprint match.


thats the library choices on my kicad,the vin and ground pins are out of its ass not the top corner.

Pin 30 is on the top right corner. (Vin)
GND is below that and also Pin 4 (On the left 4 from the top).

This matches the datasheet:
http://www.mouser.com/pdfdocs/Gravitech_Arduino_Nano3_0.pdf

look at my pic the vin is on the top edge and not on the side,thats my whole point,it doesent match my nano in my hand,the footprint is clearly wrong,at least on this copy of ver8 i have installed.

OP doesn’t seem to want to take explanations given. No point continuing.

It’s too late now but the original misconception was not understanding the difference between symbol and footprint; posting about footprints in the schematics category was a giveaway. Symbol pins don’t have to bear any resemblance to the physical layout of pins. Maybe they came from using Fritzing. Well when they can be more polite they can ask the next question.

1 Like