Wrong symbols on PCB?

When KiCad splits schematic symbols, it places a letter (A, B, C, etc) after the RefDes.
So, on the schematic J6A and J6B are different symbols, but they are units of the same physical footprint J6 on the PCB (without a suffix).

I am also still not sure what you want the PCB to look like. J5B looks like an audio jack on the schematic, but it has an XLR footprint on the PCB. Do you want another footprint type for that?

In KiCad, pin numbers on schematic symbols also have to match the pad numbers in the footprint. You can have an “S” or an “T” pin in the schematic, but then the footprint also needs to use the same “S” and “T” pad names. This is all very much beginner stuff explained in tutorials.

i understand.

The main goal i have is to have the XLR just like it is later on the pcb as here:
grafik
but without the additional jacks. i dont need these because the pins are on the xlr anyway.

i initially thought that this could caused the routing issue i told earlier.
but i think there are some issues with the foodprints so i cant route them like i did in the schematic.

Thank you!

Your Channel 1 XLR is designated J6, but the corresponding Jack is J5. This will create 2 seperate footprints on your board.

1 Like

Thanks!

I really dont know why this happend. tried adding a new one and its the same. J8A and J8B :smiley:

Are J8A and B different symbols or different parts of the same symbol ? each symbol has a footprint, if you have two symbols you have two footprints, if you have one symbol with two parts then you will have one footprint.

its one symbol with two parts

So you will have one footprint, J8


That worked!

Thank you all!


But i still cant route GN to one of my Diagnostic Ports on the preamp. even tho they are connected in the schematic.
And i can tell that the foodprints are right

oh damn i think i know why. these pins have no contact with the pcb whatsoever.

N000369_Neutrik_NCJ10FI_H

My fault

Check all your clearance settings in your board setup (Design rules > Constraints), that MAX device looks like it’s pads are too close to each other to comply with your constraints.

i changed my lane width to 0,1mm. but it is still the same. the lanes are smaller than one pad.

Maybe, possibly, probably. There are a whole lot of different XLR connector footprints for slightly different models and also for different brands. Connectors are by far the most troublesome footprint type because there are so many variations.

It’s not about track width but clearances, they are shown my the outline around pads . . .

0.2mm in Board constraints and Default Netclass

now 0.1mm in Board constraints and Default Netclass

image

0.25mm clearance means this device cannot be routed too as it has no clearance

which number should i change?

Btw. i can connect something to the preamp, just not to the xlr combo jack.

I guess that you don’t have a connecting Net then . . .

Im pretty sure its connected

grafik

The little squares and circles indicate open ends. ERC will also flag this. Have you run ERC?

image

Global labels for “inputs” and “outputs” have their attachment points on “opposite” sides. When in doubt, you can simply drag a label to the side. When there is a connection to the pin, then KiCad will draw the connecting wire in between.

1 Like