Text in Copper Zone

Awesome! Glad it worked for you!

Any chance the layer could be simply edited from F.Cu to ā€œKeepout areaā€ in the file? Or is this impossible?

Is it possible to do the ā€˜inverted copperā€™ as shown? image

Not directly, but the expanded Gerber standard supports black and white (positive/negative) plotting, so you could plot the text on a separate layers and then instruct the board fab to add as negative to the coppers, or you could manually edit/append the copper Gerber files with the negative header + text.

Doing this, the user (of course) needs to take care to ensure the negative text does not cross any traces :slight_smile:

Not sure how to do this. Does anyone know what layers/objects in KiCAD would create this?

A bit late to the party but here we go:

I see two options.

One option would be to create keepout area(s) from the text. This keepout area(s) can then be placed inside a zone.

The second option is to create a custom pad that is a rectangle on the outside and has the text cut away. (Sadly there is no ā€œnegativeā€ pad shape so you would need to create a single polygon with the text removed. Have a look at this part of the kicad-footprint-generator for inspiration)

1 Like

The lazy solution is to just trace over the text with traces, then it shows as desired.

Edit: Reread the later question, Yes keepout zones set to arbitary slope is a way to accomplish it, little bit annoying, but it functions.

edit: For the ā€œeā€ at the left end of the horizontal stroke, I went up, traced out the top void, then continued down on the tail

2 Likes

Keepout areas are zones, filled zones could be converted to keepouts, but not tracks or letters. And text is a simple item with the text string and properties in the file, itā€™s not lines and canā€™t be converted to something other.

There is a wish for this: https://bugs.launchpad.net/kicad/+bug/1463857

1 Like

Creating the text only on the Mask layer, while being the copper layer filled behind it, will result almost the desired pattern (without the clearance contour).

2 Likes

Resurrecting ancient threads so members have to wade through many outdated posts is silly
For new, relevant information, please start a new thread.