Newbie question about board outline

“Very logical sanity, because the board should normally reflect the schematic.”

I couldn’t disagree more. It’s totally the designer’s choice because it has to be. You could for example have the board be simply a component that mounts inside an elaborate casting or molding and needs to have many additional cutaways that aren’t necessarily contiguous to each other. Or perhaps there’s a mix of RF with microstrip and some digital electronics on the same board. Simply because there’s some elaborate provision for some RF situation doesn’t really imply there’s some implication that it makes sense to incorporate all that into some “standard component” no one will ever use again.The argument only makes sense if the only place you intend to use this tool is in the engineering department of a large bureaucratic corporation with a lot of rules that only get followed because they’re “in the book”.

I said “normally”. KiCad is flexible enough, either lock the footprint or add a symbol to the shcematic. It’s totally the designer’s choice. Of course there can be room for improvement in KiCad.

3 Likes

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.