Native Export for OBD++

Perhaps I’m missing something, but I don’t see who it is assigned to?

Maybe we can gather useful information here like the above quoted one which estimate the developing effort. Other information may include:

  1. the IPC-2581C complexity and the standard itself;
  2. the possible implementation framework or implementation thoughts;
  3. the knowledge should be known to implementation;
    etc.

Maybe this feature is not a one-man effort, and it needs team work with a leader developer!

Oh huh, I can’t see that on mobile till I extend the sidebar. I learned something about gitlab’s mobile site today! In the past I just relied on the timeline providing the same information as the sidebar, but I guess sometimes assigning someone doesn’t create a timeline item?

Anyways, apologies for going slightly off topic.

a bit more offtopic: it actually does, not sure exactly how it looks like on the mobile version but you can filter the activities to only show comments, the history or both. maybe your filter is set to comments only?

Thank you for the reminder. I’d been thinking about doing this simple step for too long, and this pushed me off the fence, so to speak. I finally signed up for Gitlab so I could do this.

ODB++ or IPC-2581 are increasingly being requested or recommended by my company’s assembly houses and actually by the board houses as well. It saves them time and money.

John

1 Like

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.