How to use the jumper symbol

This is the first easy solution after mostly 40 post.

The catch is, we have a brand new to electronics person struggling to come to terms with the concepts of electronics design and working with a single layer board.
Vias and double layer boards would solve all the problems, but the OP is not at that level yet.

Thatā€™s what we suspect but OP never admitted to this. All the mentions of the word single are by others. XY problem, remember?

So instead flail around trying to cram most connections on one layer?

More like struggling to understand the different concepts between wires on schematics and tracks on boards.
This is still the big problem:

@petercl14

A few questions to answer members speculations, so we may give more help:

Are you new to electronic design and this sort of software?

Are you intending to use Through Hole Technology or Surface Mount Design?

Are you intending to use a single layer PCBoard?

1 Like

I donā€™t think double layers or vias are much of a huge progression beyond a single layer board . . . and stretching ones understanding is not a bad thing, challenges help us all learn faster.

I think the difference between the schematic and the PCB and how they are linked with a ratsnest are what the OP needs to get to grips with first.

The first PCB ā€œCADā€ I every used, many, many years ago, EasyPCB, had schematics and ratsnests but I didnā€™t understand what the purpose of them was, it didnā€™t stop me designing a functional PCB but would have helped me get there quicker had I known.

Beyond amusing myself while drinking coffee, I donā€™t know why Iā€™m bothering to postā€¦

I canā€™t do most of my projects (single and double sided PCBā€™s) without at least One Jumper.

Usually, I donā€™t bother with a Kicad schematic, I just draw them with pencil. But, sometimes I do make schematics.

Only reason I show Jumpers on Schematic is to clutter it up because actual usage of them is on the PCB as a result of having to place certain parts at certain positions (and, a schematic has No relationship on those positions).

That said, once getting to the point of laying out the PCB, you can simply use PADā€™s (SMD or THT) to connect jumpers and if desired, can make Footprints of the Jumperā€¦

It canā€™t be any clearer than an Imageā€¦


OK, here is my solution:
First of, all, you do have a different understanding of a ā€œjumperā€, You should call that ā€œbridgeā€.
Now you draw your schematic, without thinking about how to route your tracks. Schematics finished, off you go with the layout. Now it is in the layout, that you realize that need to jump (I wanted to avoid that word) over some tracks. Click on that track, it gets highlited in the schematics. Cut that wire/connection in schematics and place a pad (or hole with a pad around it) at each end. Give both ends the same net name. Now schematics knows that there is a connection, but in Layout, that doesnā€™t make an unrouted air wire. Finish your layout and donā€™t forget to solder in that jumper ā€¦ err ā€¦ bridge.

HTH,
Nick

2 Likes

It is possible that the nomenclature varies, but on the PCB:s of various mass produced equipment I have seen, where there have been these kinds of soldered in wires to get the trace over other traces, the common reference has been ā€œJP1ā€, ā€œJP2ā€ etc. or possibly ā€œJ1ā€, ā€œJ2ā€ etc.
I donā€™t remember to have seen ā€œBR1ā€ or similar, even though I canā€™t exclude the possibility that it would exist.

There a 3 questions that @jmk has asked and once answered should help with this thread as Iā€™m struggling to know what the problem is now. I think our OP hasnā€™t had any experience with this sort of work and Iā€™m not going to read it all again, so Iā€™m wondering if there are any recommendations for reading material that may help and I mean from the very concept of a PCB and up, perhaps this would help ? :nerd_face:
:mouse:

1 Like

The direction is called the development of power electronicsā€¦ There are a lot of different jumpers and shunts

I think it would, I also think the following quote shows what the OP Is struggling with . . .

. . . I think the OP is expecting to draw the schematic like a PCB track layout and doesnā€™t yet grasp that that is not the way to do it.

3 Likes

This topic was automatically closed 90 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.